Having recently spent some time in Cornwall specifically to look at the work of the abstract expressionist painter Peter Lanyon. I wanted to get a broader understanding of what he was trying to illuminate through his work. I was equally looking at the way an abstract painter develops their approach to get at their truth. I think a lot of abstract artists find there is a fight with the limitations of the medium they are working in. They are toiling to turn paint in this case into a core representation of pure feeling. To convey the essence of their perspective without the flat illustrative method of mere representation requires a deep philosophical connection with the subject matter. It necessitates negotiation of a labyrinth of complex internal feelings, not only about the subject itself but also about what it is revealing inside the artist themselves.
Peter Lanyon to me is a very important painter in the sense of trying to tell the story of his place. His work on first contact is a confusing collection of perspective and thick layered oils. This makes initial understanding and comprehension difficult and complex as the brain is seeking recognisable structure and form in order to interpret what it sees. A common issue with abstraction. Some may connect purely as an aesthetic experience based upon tonality and colour but Lanyon and other abstract painters are not seeking an aesthetic experience they have found pure aesthetics constrains communication and feeling, which is why they choose to push paint beyond its formal boundaries and seek to represent their experience of the world in the many facets and perspectives it represents to them.
This brings me to place. I sought out the land where Lanyon painted and the areas of Cornwall where he found inspiration. I saw his paintings first and as I said I found them difficult, so I sought out the places that he represented. In particular I went to the mining districts of Cornwall around St Just and walked the land and stood and watched and felt the earth beneath my feet. I explored the variation in rock form, the shifts in perspective and vista and I experienced the abandoned mining buildings and read what happened at these mines and the labour and the intense heavy industry these places were home to. I looked at the colour, the sky, the vegetation and the earth and each night I came home I looked at Peter Lanyon’s paintings again. I was gradually beginning to understand how close Peter was coming to connecting with the spirit and heart of this landscape. It was revelatory to experience art in this way. To not just stand and look at a landscape and see it illustrated in a painting, but to be in the landscape and see all its elements uncovered in a previously complex work of art. His palette became the vegetation, the earth and rocks and his shapes became the shifting perspective of light changing. The thickness of paint made one feel the land under foot and his work was conveying these elements as a Cornish painter who knew his landscape and loved what he saw enough to dedicate his life to trying to convey these feelings of place.
The medium of paint for me can only explore an emotional response to something through abstraction. Through the constant turning and re turning of colour and density on canvas. Perhaps the reason Peter was not more regarded, is that he spoke so specifically well of the Cornish landscape. His pictures were very Cornish in the sense of the history his paintings spoke of. His influence would have been great however upon any artist who was looking at paint and seeking to represent the essence of place and not just merely illustrate an aesthetic response. I spoke to some visitors to the exhibition and many if not all were dismissive and felt a failure to connect or understand what was being said. Some paintings they found aesthetically pleasing and this was enough. There is so much more there in all great dedicated abstract expression, so much more is given by the artist themselves in trying to find the centre of a meaning and to communicate that. Perhaps as I did, one has to deliberately go out and sense the place the work was created in to fully grasp what a painting means or seeks to convey. Is it worth it? Most definitely yes ,that is how one learns as an artist and develops an appreciation of other artists work and thought and it also expands our own creative channels. It stimulates our nervous system to seek our own response to our own landscapes and to break through the one dimensional nature of illustration.
Peter’s later paintings were ones done as he became more interested in flying and started viewing the landscape from above. His paint becomes thinner as the distance between himself and the land increases. He is seeing through cloud and veils of blue and experiencing the land quite differently and this is easily felt in the later works and in many ways far more initially accessible. It is 40 years since Peter had his work displayed in a major exhibition and it seems appropriate that Cornwall would be the place for that given the works are so part of that landscape. I hope more people get to see what he was producing in the 50’s and compare this to the likes of De Kooning in America and realise that Peter’s work was very definitely central in a global group of artists seeing abstraction as a necessary response of the soul.
The painting shown is not by Peter Lanyon but rather Willem De Kooning part of the global abstract expression movement during the 1950’s
Related Articles
- Bob Crossley: Abstract painter whose work was inspired by his love of the Cornish landscape (independent.co.uk)
- Sharon L. Butler: Abstract Expressionist New York: Line and Legacy (huffingtonpost.com)